Journal of Health And Care
Volume 20, Issue 1 (spring 2018)
JHC 2018, 20(1): 48-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
SheihkNejad H, Saemi H, Akbari Daghi H. The Relationship between Identity Styles and Spiritual Intelligence with Emotional Divorce in Married Students. JHC 2018; 20 (1) :48-56
URL: http://hcjournal.arums.ac.ir/article-1-941-en.html
URL: http://hcjournal.arums.ac.ir/article-1-941-en.html
Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Azadshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Azadshahr, Iran
Abstract: (4605 Views)
Background & aim: In recent years, the ominous phenomenon of the emotional divorce has shaken the foundation of families and consequently the moral and social foundations of the whole society. This phenomenon diverted the society into various problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between identity styles and spiritual intelligence with emotional divorce in married students of the Islamic Azad University of Gonabad.
Methods: This study was conducted using the descriptive and correlational design. The statistical population of this study was all married students studying at the Islamic Azad University of Gonabad. The sample size was 313 people (160 males and 153 females) who were selected by available sampling method. The data were collected using questionnaire of Berzonsky Identity Styles Questionnaire, King's Spiritual Intelligence Scale, and Gottman Emotional Divorce Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis.
Results: Findings indicated that the information identity style (r=-0.264), normative (r=-0.154), confusion- avoidance (r=0.138), commitment (r=-0.181), and spiritual intelligence (r=-0.181) were correlated with emotional divorce. In addition, regression analysis results were significant for predicting emotional divorce based on identity styles and spiritual intelligence.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that style of identity and spiritual intelligence are effective factors in emotional divorce. Therefore, studying the type of identity style and spiritual intelligence of couples can provide useful information to family counselors and psychologists.
Methods: This study was conducted using the descriptive and correlational design. The statistical population of this study was all married students studying at the Islamic Azad University of Gonabad. The sample size was 313 people (160 males and 153 females) who were selected by available sampling method. The data were collected using questionnaire of Berzonsky Identity Styles Questionnaire, King's Spiritual Intelligence Scale, and Gottman Emotional Divorce Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis.
Results: Findings indicated that the information identity style (r=-0.264), normative (r=-0.154), confusion- avoidance (r=0.138), commitment (r=-0.181), and spiritual intelligence (r=-0.181) were correlated with emotional divorce. In addition, regression analysis results were significant for predicting emotional divorce based on identity styles and spiritual intelligence.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that style of identity and spiritual intelligence are effective factors in emotional divorce. Therefore, studying the type of identity style and spiritual intelligence of couples can provide useful information to family counselors and psychologists.
Type of Study: correlation design |
Received: 2017/08/29 | Accepted: 2017/12/1 | Published: 2018/05/8
Received: 2017/08/29 | Accepted: 2017/12/1 | Published: 2018/05/8
References
1. Shoa Kazemi M, Seif S. Family therapy. Tehran: Pazinehpress, 2010 [Persian].
2. Sharafi M. Normal and equivalent family (the anatomy of family). Tehran: PTA Publisher, 2004. [Persian]
3. Roshani S. Emotional divorce: backgrounds and consequences. Thesis for Master degree. Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences. Alzahra University. Tehran, 2010 [Persian].
4. Liz S, Warren K, Anne B. The family (skills-based sociology). USA: Palgrave Publisher, 2012.
5. Olson DH, Defrain J. Marriage and families. New York: McGraw Hill, 2006.
6. Scanzoni J, Scanzoni LD. Men, women and change: Sociology of marriage and family. New York: McGraw Hill, 1988.
7. Charls G, John D. The influence of parenting styles on children cognitive development. Louisiana State University Center, 2011.
8. Erikson EH. Identity. Norton, 1968.
9. Berzonsky MD, Cieciuch J, Duriez B, Soenens B. The how and what of identity formation: Association between identity styles and value orientations. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;50(2):259-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.007]
10. Berzonsky MD. Identity processing style, self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: A social-cognitive perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2004;1(4):303-15. [DOI:10.1080/17405620444000120]
11. Karimian N, Heidari H, Salari S. Explaining marital engagement of married women and men based on identity styles and fear of intimacy. Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;3(13):65-81 .[Persian]
12. Mousavi SF. Comparison of identity styles and attitude towards love in anticipation of emotional divorce of married women and men in Qazvin city. Women's Researches Center. Tehran, 2012. [Persian]
13. Emmons RA. Is spirituality an intelligence? Motivation cognition and the psychology of ultimate concern. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2000;10(1):3-26. [DOI:10.1207/S15327582IJPR1001_2]
14. King D. Rethinking claims of spiritual intelligence: A definition, model and measure applications of modeling in the natural and social sciences program. Trent University. Canada, 2008.
15. Elkins MR. Developing a plan for pediatric spiritual care. Holistic Nursing Practice. 2004;18(4):179-84. [DOI:10.1097/00004650-200407000-00002]
16. Berzonsky MD. Self-construction over the life-span: A process perspective on identity formation. In: GJ Neimeye, Neimeye R (Eds). Advances in personal construct psychology. Greenwich. CT: JAL, 1990. [PMID]
17. Hejazi E, Farsi Nejad M, Asgari A. Identity styles and academic achievement: The role of academic self-efficacy identity. Journal of Psychology. 2007;11(4):394-413 [Persian].
18. King DB. The spiritual intelligence project. Trent University. Canada, 2007.
19. MashayekhiDolatabadi MR, Mohammadi M. Resilience and spiritual intelligence predictors of as academic self-efficacy in urban and rural students. Journal of School Psychology. 2014;3(2):253-66 [Persian].
20. Bayat Mokhtari S. The effectiveness of group therapeutic reality therapy on reducing emotional divorce and its psychological consequences. Thesis for Master degree. Mashhad Ferdowsi University, 2013 [Persian].
21. Salayani F, AsghariEbrahimabadi M. Comparison of emotional divorce in introverted and outspoken individuals. Third conference on social workers of Iran. Islamic Azad University. Ghonabad: 3-4 september 2014 [Persian].
22. Fouji A, Naderi F. Relationship of social skills and religious beliefs with emotional divorce on client women referring to Ahvaz psychological consultant centers. Journal of Culture and Woman. 2016;7(27):23-36 [Persian].
23. Yaghoobzadeh A, Abbasi H, Hoseini H. The role of spiritual health and spiritual intelligence in predicting emotional divorce. First scientific conference on educational sciences and psychology of social and cultural damages in Iran. Center Islamic Studies and Research of Soroush Hekmat Mortazavi. Tehran: 18 March 2015 [Persian].
24. Mahoney A, Pargament K, Jewell T, Swank A, Scott E, Emery E. Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of Family Psychology. 1999;13(3):321-38. [DOI:10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.321]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |